Saturday, February 27, 2016

The Unexpected Origins of the Asian American Studies Program

The Unexpected Origins of the Asian American Studies Program
Salley Lee
On February 1995, the students of a well known university submitted a proposal for an Asian-American studies program with several letters of faculty support and over 1200 student signatures. However, the administration rejected every single point in their proposal. To compromise, the students submitted another proposal with just two tenure-track professors and a director for the program, which was again rejected. Thus, in April 1995, a rally of 300 students protested the administration’s decisions. When that didn’t work, 17 students launched a hunger strike. This event shocked students at not only the university this was occurring, but also at many campuses across the nation. Students of Stanford, Princeton, the Midwest Asian American Student Union, and many other campuses began fasting in support of the hunger strike. The hunger strike ended after 23 days upon the realization that administration did not intend to establish an Asian American studies program in the near future. However, their efforts were not in vain as the program was instituted four years later in 1999. This event sparked proposals for an Asian American Studies program in other campuses across the nation. Today 37 Colleges/Universities have an Asian American Studies Major/Minor; 15 Colleges/Universities have an Asian American Studies Concentrations/Focus; and 18 Colleges/Universities have Asian American Courses.
Asian Americans are commonly labeled as the model minority. This label divides and disconnects Asian Americans from other minorities of America. “We’re only considered minorities when the topic of affirmative action rolls around, and then we’re shoved back into invisibility until the next time we can be trotted out as a political point against other ethnic groups.” Lisa Wong Macabasco, an alumni at UC-Berkley, describes how through the Asian American Studies class, she felt connected, not divided, with the other minorities represented in the United States. “I came to understand the many struggles that Asian Americans share with African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans, as well as our differing experiences in this country.” This class was the first time she learned about her heritage and the history of her people in the States. “It was the first time I saw myself reflected in history books.” Even taking just one course “ brought me to a better sense of myself, my heritage, and my responsibility as a woman of color working in the media.”
Often, Asian Americans have been accused of disinterest in the affairs of American minorities due to their lack of participation in demonstrations and other activism activities. However, this article asks, rather than disinterest, could it be the lack of knowledge that divides Asian Americans from the other minorities of America?

Asia’s Views on LGBT Rights

Asia’s Views on LGBT Rights
Emily Laur and Connie Zheng
Asia is typically thought of as more conservative toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) issues. Although homosexuality is legal and not punishable by law in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (it remains illegal in India), support for legal rights and protections for those a part of the LGBT community is another battle entirely. While the right to change gender is legal in the countries above, including India, other LGBT rights such as same-sex marriage, same-sex adoption, employment discrimination, housing discrimination, and discrimination in general are largely either illegal, unrecognized, or unprotected according to EqualDex.com.
Despite undertones of homosexuality having been incorporated into popular culture, most recognizably in Japan though publications of same-sex relationships and through Japanese Dramas, written laws protecting LGBT rights have not been formally brought forth. A positive attitude toward same-sex marriage by an estimated 53% of the Japanese public suggests the LGBT movement in Japan has gained traction and will continue to push for amendments to legislation. South Korea with its 39% positive opinion, has begun to introduce the idea of same-sex relationships into the mainstream media by playing with the idea of cross-dressing in Korean Dramas. This type of relationship is seen in Coffee Prince (2007) in which the main male role begins to question his own sexual orientation as he develops feelings for woman he perceives to be a man. Another notable appearance was made through the music industry in 2013 with K.Will’s music video “Please Don’t” which featured an unrequited love between two male friends.
In contrast, Taiwan is recognized as one of the most progressive Asian countries in terms of LGBT rights. Announcements by the Taiwanese government back in July 2015 established Taiwan as one of the first Asian countries to put forth same-sex partnership legislation. The marriage equality bill supported legalizing same-sex marriage and allowed married gay couples the right to adopt children. Currently, same sex-marriage continues to go unrecognized from a legal standpoint, however, the right to same-sex adoption is now legal. In addition to adoption rights, Taiwan also allows homosexuals to serve openly in the military and provides more stable protections for the LGBT community under law such as making LGBT discrimination illegal in some contexts and supporting nondiscrimination in employment (for sexual orientation only).
However, not all Asian countries are as progressive as Taiwan. There are many Southeast Asian countries (India, Singapore, Brunei, Myanmar) where identifying as LGBT is illegal and punishable by law or even death. Additionally while homosexuality is not illegal in some Asian countries (Philippines and Thailand) these countries do not necessarily provide protection for the LGBT community against hate crimes or open discrimination. Though the transition in public opinion seems slow or even backward, efforts to introduce same-sex relationships as a social norm in some Southeast Asian countries suggest that support for LGBT rights may become a highly debated topic in the future.




Problematizing the Model Minority

Problematizing the Model Minority
Guest Writer: Austin Lukondi


Oftentimes, Asians and Asian Americans are depicted as successful, smart, and well-behaved individuals. This ideology is often justified by the notion that Asian Americans embody “success”: the idea that Asian people are somehow gifted with a cultural or biological superiority that allows them to succeed in American society. Thus, Asian Americans are deemed the “model (racial) minority” in the United States. Though the stereotype that AA people are successful and well-mannered may initially seem like a compliment, in reality it is a western, orientalist idea that actually contributes to the oppression of AA people. Specifically, I believe that it has a negative impact on the mental health of AA people, reinforces the idea of “the docile Asian”, and negates the real lived experiences of many AA people.
In order to reproduce the myth of the model minority, Asian people must uphold the standards of success and subservience. They must not only accomplish what everyone else does, even more so they must go above and beyond even their White counterparts to uphold the caricature of the “studious/nerdy” Asian. This type of academic pressure to succeed undoubtedly takes a toll on the mental health of Asian American people. Studies show that while Asians were more likely than White students to deal with difficulties of stress, feelings of hopelessness, depression, and suicidal thoughts, they were less likely to seek counseling than their White peers (Chu & Sue, 2011)[1]. This disparity frequently manifests into actual suicides on college campuses—at Cornell University where only 14% of students are Asian American, they account for 55% of the suicides on campus (11/20 suicides)[2]. The expectation that AA people are supposed to be silent, complacent, respectable minorities coupled with the lack of mental health resources for Asian American communities creates a toxic environment.
While the stereotype that Asian American are “intelligent, hard workers” currently exists, this label wasn’t always ascribed to us. In the late 19th century when Asian people first started to immigrate to the United States, America was thrown into a state of “yellow peril”. A fear that East Asian people, and their culture was a mortal danger to Western society. Images of Asian people depicted as dirty, animal-like madmen surfaced in major cities—the same type of ideas that prompted the Chinese Exclusion Act—the very first law created by the USA to prevent a specific ethnic group from immigrating. Similarly, the Page Act of 1875 targeted Asian women and prohibited them from entering the United States because they were believed to be immoral prostitutes who were sexually promiscuous. While explicit, legal exclusion is mostly in the past, fear and xenophobia surrounding Asian Americans still exist. Despite the fact that Asian immigrants have been in the United States since the 1700’s, many AA people are still deemed foreigners, and face microaggressions which lead to feeling alien in one’s own country, the exoticization and fetishization of Asian bodies, and the invisibility of Asian Americans. As more immigrants settled in America, the culture that was once seen as barbaric and dangerous simply became an oddity.  AA people became “the other”; an exotic, strange, and unknown entity rooted in a disciplined and traditional culture.
The myth of the model minority is fueled by the idea that because of a universal, pan-Asian culture, Asian Americans are respectable, docile, and obedient. This was in part because Asian Americans had less history surrounding political activism and were generally considered to be more financially successful than other non-Whites. Thus, Asian America was used as a model for the ideal racial minority. In reality, the trope of the model minority reinforces oppressive ideology rooted in the modernist ideology of “progress”. The idea starts with notion that Asian people are successful because of biological determinism and cultural superiority which is reflected in their supposed intellectual abilities. When and if Asian people do succeed, the model minority myth is then reinforced—“progress” is made because an ethnic minority is successful. This in turn, reinforces neoliberal ideologies of individualism and meritocracy—that hard work and determination are the pathways to equality. This falsely reassures American society into thinking that the American Dream is indeed possible for everyone regardless of their racial or ethnic background. Even further, it reifies prejudices of anti-blackness and anti-brownness through individualism under the false pretense that because the model minority is able to achieve “success” all minorities should be able to do the same.
However, the reality is that Asian Americans aren’t living the American Dream. The images and stereotypes of Asian Americans as successful among minority groups is in direct conflict with the true, lived experiences of many Asian people. While Asian Americans are the most rapidly growing racial group in America—they are not necessarily successful. Many Asian Americans are demonized for their lack of English fluency, with one in three Asian American people being designated at “Limited in English Language Proficiency.” This “limitation” impacts the types of opportunities, jobs, and mobility that AA people are able to achieve. In regard to health, 2.3 million Asian Americans are uninsured and often avoid health services because of this—contributing to a variety of health disparities. Additionally, Asian American is often conflated to East Asian American, something that is harmful for AA people who fall out of that identity. For example, while the stereotype may be that many (East) Asian people do well in school, the high school drop-out rates for Hmong, Laotian, and Cambodian Americans range from 35-40%. Yet because of the myth of the model minority, these groups are often ignored and left to fend for themselves.
Asian Americans are not China Dolls, Geisha Girls, or Lotus Blossoms. We are not exotic, subservient and eager to please. We don’t all go to college, and not all of us are successful. We are not the Dragon Ladies and we are not Fu Manchu. We aren’t all foreigners and we don’t all “speak Asian”. We don’t care that you tried kimchi for the first time or that you listen to K-pop. We don’t all look the same, and believe it or not, some of us are Latino and Black. We are not Asians—we are Asian Americans. Most importantly, we are not invisible, we are not complacent and we are not silent.

[1] http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=orpc
[2] http://reappropriate.co/2015/08/the-new-york-times-doubles-down-on-its-erasure-of-aapi-student-victims-of-suicide/